|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the final day of the hackathon, each team will have **10 minutes** to present their project.
|
|
|
|
The judging committee will evaluate the projects and select **1 top team** and **2 outstanding teams**.
|
|
|
|
The award ceremony will be held in the afternoon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **KRICT:** Dr. Jungho Shin
|
|
|
|
- **Yonsei University:** Prof. Woosun Jang
|
|
|
|
- **Fordham University:** Prof. Joshua Scrier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation Criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. Data Utilization and Completeness (30%)
|
|
|
|
- How effectively did the team utilize the provided chemical and material property data?
|
|
|
|
- Were innovative and efficient methods used in data preprocessing and analysis?
|
|
|
|
- Did the team creatively integrate the database and API to solve the problem?
|
|
|
|
- How complete is the solution or prototype in addressing the problem within the given time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. Creativity and Innovation (40%)
|
|
|
|
- How original and innovative is the proposed solution?
|
|
|
|
- Did the team approach the data and machine learning algorithms differently from conventional methods?
|
|
|
|
- Did they present new perspectives and creative solutions for problem-solving?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. Technical Feasibility (15%)
|
|
|
|
- Is the proposed solution realistically implementable?
|
|
|
|
- How well did the team overcome technical challenges and limitations?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. Teamwork and Presentation (15%)
|
|
|
|
- How effectively did the team collaborate with each other?
|
|
|
|
- Was the idea and solution clearly and effectively communicated during the presentation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We look forward to seeing your innovative solutions and teamwork in action. Good luck to all teams! |
